motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs Wekan
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
motion.tools (Antragsgrün)
Manage motions and amendments for (political) conventions
VS
Wekan
Open-source kanban board for collaboration
| Feature | motion.tools (Antragsgrün) | Wekan |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, snap |
| GitHub stars | ★ 145 | ★ 21,021 |
| First released | 2026 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | Trello |
Why pick each one
Choose motion.tools (Antragsgrün) if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is motion.tools (Antragsgrün) or Wekan better?
Neither is universally better. Wekan has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and Wekan free and open-source?
Yes. motion.tools (Antragsgrün) is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Wekan under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and Wekan with Docker?
motion.tools (Antragsgrün): yes. Wekan: yes.
Related comparisons
- motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs Focalboard
- Wekan vs Focalboard
- motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs git-bug
- Wekan vs git-bug
- motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs Kanboard
- Wekan vs Kanboard
- motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs Leantime
- Wekan vs Leantime
- motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs Habitica Self-Hosted
- Wekan vs Habitica Self-Hosted