Focalboard vs motion.tools (Antragsgrün)
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Focalboard
Open-source project and task management boards
VS
motion.tools (Antragsgrün)
Manage motions and amendments for (political) conventions
| Feature | Focalboard | motion.tools (Antragsgrün) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 26,376 | ★ 145 |
| First released | 2021 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Trello, Asana, Notion | — |
Why pick each one
Choose motion.tools (Antragsgrün) if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Focalboard or motion.tools (Antragsgrün) better?
Focalboard is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider motion.tools (Antragsgrün) if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Focalboard and motion.tools (Antragsgrün) free and open-source?
Yes. Focalboard is licensed under MIT and motion.tools (Antragsgrün) under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Focalboard and motion.tools (Antragsgrün) with Docker?
Focalboard: yes. motion.tools (Antragsgrün): yes.