SHSelfHostIndex

motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs Planka

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
MO motion.tools (Antragsgrün) Manage motions and amendments for (political) conventions VS PL Planka Realtime kanban board for workgroups
Featuremotion.tools (Antragsgrün)Planka
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 145★ 12,330
First released20262019
Replaces—Trello

Why pick each one

Choose motion.tools (Antragsgrün) if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
motion.tools (Antragsgrün) details

Choose Planka if…

  • Fast real-time updates
  • Familiar interface
  • Lightweight
Planka details

Frequently asked questions

Is motion.tools (Antragsgrün) or Planka better?

Planka is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider motion.tools (Antragsgrün) if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and Planka free and open-source?

Yes. motion.tools (Antragsgrün) is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Planka under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and Planka with Docker?

motion.tools (Antragsgrün): yes. Planka: yes.

Related comparisons