SHSelfHostIndex

motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs Plane

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
MO motion.tools (Antragsgrün) Manage motions and amendments for (political) conventions VS PL Plane Open-source project and issue tracking tool
Featuremotion.tools (Antragsgrün)Plane
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 145★ 55,704
First released20262023
Replaces—Jira, Linear, Asana

Why pick each one

Choose motion.tools (Antragsgrün) if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
motion.tools (Antragsgrün) details

Choose Plane if…

  • Polished modern interface
  • Good for product teams
  • Active development
Plane details

Frequently asked questions

Is motion.tools (Antragsgrün) or Plane better?

Neither is universally better. Plane has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and Plane free and open-source?

Yes. motion.tools (Antragsgrün) is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Plane under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and Plane with Docker?

motion.tools (Antragsgrün): yes. Plane: yes.

Related comparisons