SHSelfHostIndex

motion.tools (Antragsgrün) vs OpenProject

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
MO motion.tools (Antragsgrün) Manage motions and amendments for (political) conventions VS OP OpenProject Open-source project management and collaboration
Featuremotion.tools (Antragsgrün)OpenProject
CategoryProject Management & TasksProject Management & Tasks
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguagePHPRuby
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 145★ 15,794
First released20262012
Replaces—Jira, Asana

Why pick each one

Choose motion.tools (Antragsgrün) if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
motion.tools (Antragsgrün) details

Choose OpenProject if…

  • Very feature-complete
  • Good for classic project management
  • Strong permissions
OpenProject details

Frequently asked questions

Is motion.tools (Antragsgrün) or OpenProject better?

Neither is universally better. OpenProject has the larger community, while motion.tools (Antragsgrün) is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and OpenProject free and open-source?

Yes. motion.tools (Antragsgrün) is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenProject under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run motion.tools (Antragsgrün) and OpenProject with Docker?

motion.tools (Antragsgrün): yes. OpenProject: yes.

Related comparisons