Mosh vs noVNC
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mosh
Mobile shell with roaming and intermittent connectivity
VS
noVNC
VNC client that runs entirely in the browser
| Feature | Mosh | noVNC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,307 | ★ 13,911 |
| First released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Replaces | SSH | RealVNC |
Why pick each one
Choose Mosh if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 14.3k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Choose noVNC if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Mosh or noVNC better?
Neither is universally better. Mosh has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mosh and noVNC free and open-source?
Yes. Mosh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and noVNC under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mosh and noVNC with Docker?
Mosh: check the project docs for container support. noVNC: yes.