EasyTier vs noVNC
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | EasyTier | noVNC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,019 | ★ 13,911 |
| First released | 2024 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Tailscale, ZeroTier | RealVNC |
Why pick each one
Choose EasyTier if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13k GitHub stars
- Written in Rust
Choose noVNC if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is EasyTier or noVNC better?
noVNC is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider EasyTier if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are EasyTier and noVNC free and open-source?
Yes. EasyTier is licensed under Apache-2.0 and noVNC under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EasyTier and noVNC with Docker?
EasyTier: yes. noVNC: yes.