Monitoror vs Zabbix
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Monitoror
Unified monitoring wallboard for builds and services
VS
Zabbix
Enterprise-grade open-source monitoring solution
| Feature | Monitoror | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go Template |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,382 | ★ 6,228 |
| First released | 2019 | 2001 |
| Replaces | Datadog | Datadog, Nagios |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Monitoror or Zabbix better?
Neither is universally better. Zabbix has the larger community, while Monitoror is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Monitoror and Zabbix free and open-source?
Yes. Monitoror is licensed under MIT and Zabbix under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Monitoror and Zabbix with Docker?
Monitoror: yes. Zabbix: yes.