Monitoror vs Pushgateway
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Monitoror | Pushgateway |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 33 · At risk | 87 · Excellent |
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,389 | ★ 3,369 |
| First released | 2019 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Datadog | Datadog |
What are Monitoror and Pushgateway?
Monitoror
Monitoror is a unified monitoring wallboard that displays the status of CI pipelines, services, and other checks on a single screen. It is designed for office TVs and team information radiators.
- Wallboard-style display
- CI and HTTP monitors
- Single-binary deployment
- Configurable tiles
Pushgateway
The Prometheus Pushgateway allows ephemeral and batch jobs to expose their metrics to Prometheus. Jobs push metrics to the gateway, which Prometheus then scrapes on its regular schedule.
- Accepts pushed metrics
- Bridges batch jobs to Prometheus
- Persists metrics to disk
- Tiny footprint
Monitoror vs Pushgateway: key differences
Both projects are written in Go. Licensing differs — MIT for Monitoror versus Apache-2.0 for Pushgateway. Pushgateway is the lighter option, starting around 32 MB of RAM against 64 MB for Monitoror. Pushgateway is the more established project (first released 2015), while Monitoror arrived in 2019.
Why pick each one
Choose Monitoror if…
- Great for office TVs
- Very lightweight
Watch out for
- Limited monitor types
- Less active development
Choose Pushgateway if…
- Solves batch job monitoring
- Simple to run
Watch out for
- Not for high-frequency metrics
- Can become a single point of failure
Frequently asked questions
Is Monitoror or Pushgateway better?
Neither is universally better. Monitoror has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Monitoror and Pushgateway free and open-source?
Yes. Monitoror is licensed under MIT and Pushgateway under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Monitoror and Pushgateway with Docker?
Monitoror: yes. Pushgateway: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Monitoror or Pushgateway?
Pushgateway has the smaller minimum footprint at 32 MB of RAM, compared to about 64 MB for Monitoror. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.