Miniflux vs Goeland
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted rss & news readers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Miniflux
Minimalist and opinionated RSS feed reader
VS
Goeland
Feed aggregator that forwards items to email and webhooks
| Feature | Miniflux | Goeland |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RSS & News Readers | RSS & News Readers |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,561 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Feedly, Inoreader | Feedly, IFTTT |
Why pick each one
Choose Goeland if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Miniflux or Goeland better?
Miniflux is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Goeland if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Miniflux and Goeland free and open-source?
Yes. Miniflux is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Goeland under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Miniflux and Goeland with Docker?
Miniflux: yes. Goeland: yes.