AzuraCast Games vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAzuraCast GamesNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 1,192★ 13,121
First released20192017
ReplacesCookie Clicker, Universal PaperclipsPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose AzuraCast Games if…

  • Trivial to host
  • Extremely lightweight
AzuraCast Games details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is AzuraCast Games or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community, while AzuraCast Games is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are AzuraCast Games and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. AzuraCast Games is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run AzuraCast Games and Nakama with Docker?

AzuraCast Games: check the project docs for container support. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons