Lichess vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLichessNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageScalaGo
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 18,557★ 13,121
First released20102017
ReplacesChess.comPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose Lichess if…

  • Full-featured chess platform
  • Completely ad-free
Lichess details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is Lichess or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Lichess has the larger community, while Nakama is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Lichess and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. Lichess is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Lichess and Nakama with Docker?

Lichess: yes. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons