mc-router vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuremc-routerNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 883★ 13,121
First released20192017
ReplacesManual port mappingPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose mc-router if…

  • Simplifies multi-server hosting
  • Very lightweight
mc-router details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is mc-router or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are mc-router and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. mc-router is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run mc-router and Nakama with Docker?

mc-router: yes. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons