Middleman vs Zola
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Middleman
Ruby static site generator with modern tooling
VS
Zola
Fast static site engine in a single binary
| Feature | Middleman | Zola |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,113 | ★ 17,308 |
| First released | 2009 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Jekyll, WordPress | WordPress, Medium |
Why pick each one
Choose Middleman if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Ruby
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Middleman or Zola better?
Neither is universally better. Zola has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Middleman and Zola free and open-source?
Yes. Middleman is licensed under MIT and Zola under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Middleman and Zola with Docker?
Middleman: check the project docs for container support. Zola: check the project docs for container support.