Mezzanine vs Pelican
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mezzanine
Lightweight content management framework for Django
VS
Pelican
Static site generator for Python and Markdown lovers
| Feature | Mezzanine | Pelican |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Blogging Platforms |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,822 | ★ 13,331 |
| First released | 2010 | 2010 |
| Replaces | WordPress | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Choose Mezzanine if…
- Quick to get a Django site running
- Includes blogging out of the box
Frequently asked questions
Is Mezzanine or Pelican better?
Neither is universally better. Pelican has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Mezzanine and Pelican free and open-source?
Yes. Mezzanine is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Pelican under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mezzanine and Pelican with Docker?
Mezzanine: yes. Pelican: check the project docs for container support.