Anchor CMS vs Mezzanine
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Anchor CMS
Lightweight blogging-focused CMS
VS
Mezzanine
Lightweight content management framework for Django
| Feature | Anchor CMS | Mezzanine |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,298 | ★ 4,822 |
| First released | 2012 | 2010 |
| Replaces | WordPress | WordPress |
Why pick each one
Choose Mezzanine if…
- Quick to get a Django site running
- Includes blogging out of the box
Frequently asked questions
Is Anchor CMS or Mezzanine better?
Neither is universally better. Mezzanine has the larger community, while Anchor CMS is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Anchor CMS and Mezzanine free and open-source?
Yes. Anchor CMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mezzanine under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Anchor CMS and Mezzanine with Docker?
Anchor CMS: yes. Mezzanine: yes.