metasfresh vs Fat Free CRM

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturemetasfreshFat Free CRM
CategoryCRM & Business AppsCRM & Business Apps
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguageJavaRuby
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM4,096 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 2,394★ 3,628
First released20152008
ReplacesSAP, NetSuiteSalesforce

Why pick each one

Choose metasfresh if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
metasfresh details

Choose Fat Free CRM if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Ruby
Fat Free CRM details

Frequently asked questions

Is metasfresh or Fat Free CRM better?

Fat Free CRM is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider metasfresh if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are metasfresh and Fat Free CRM free and open-source?

Yes. metasfresh is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Fat Free CRM under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run metasfresh and Fat Free CRM with Docker?

metasfresh: yes. Fat Free CRM: yes.

Related comparisons