Metalsmith vs Poole
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Metalsmith
Extremely simple pluggable static site generator
VS
Poole
Minimalist static website generator in a single file
| Feature | Metalsmith | Poole |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | source, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,822 | ★ 31 |
| First released | 2014 | 2009 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Jekyll | Jekyll |
Why pick each one
Choose Metalsmith if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 7.8k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Poole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Metalsmith or Poole better?
Neither is universally better. Metalsmith has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Metalsmith and Poole free and open-source?
Yes. Metalsmith is licensed under MIT and Poole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Metalsmith and Poole with Docker?
Metalsmith: check the project docs for container support. Poole: check the project docs for container support.