Meilisearch vs Quickwit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Meilisearch
Fast, typo-tolerant search engine for applications
VS
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
| Feature | Meilisearch | Quickwit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 58,904 | ★ 11,471 |
| First released | 2018 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Elasticsearch | Splunk, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Meilisearch or Quickwit better?
Meilisearch is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Quickwit if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Meilisearch and Quickwit free and open-source?
Yes. Meilisearch is licensed under MIT and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Meilisearch and Quickwit with Docker?
Meilisearch: yes. Quickwit: yes.