Meilisearch vs Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Meilisearch
Fast, typo-tolerant search engine for applications
VS
Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi
Full-text search server built on the Tantivy engine
| Feature | Meilisearch | Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 58,904 | ★ 4,256 |
| First released | 2018 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Elasticsearch | Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Choose Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if…
- Lightweight search server
- Familiar API style
Frequently asked questions
Is Meilisearch or Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi better?
Meilisearch is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Meilisearch and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi free and open-source?
Yes. Meilisearch is licensed under MIT and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Meilisearch and Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi with Docker?
Meilisearch: yes. Lucene Note Solr-alt Toshi: yes.