MediaWiki vs Wiki.js

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMediaWikiWiki.js
CategoryWikis & DocumentationNotes & Knowledge Base
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPVue
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 5,135★ 28,727
First released20022017
ReplacesConfluence, NotionConfluence, Notion

Why pick each one

Choose MediaWiki if…

  • Battle-tested at massive scale
  • Huge extension ecosystem
MediaWiki details

Choose Wiki.js if…

  • Flexible and full-featured
  • Many auth options
  • Good content management
Wiki.js details

Frequently asked questions

Is MediaWiki or Wiki.js better?

Neither is universally better. Wiki.js has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are MediaWiki and Wiki.js free and open-source?

Yes. MediaWiki is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Wiki.js under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run MediaWiki and Wiki.js with Docker?

MediaWiki: yes. Wiki.js: yes.

Related comparisons