SHSelfHostIndex

MediaCMS vs Pinchflat

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
ME MediaCMS Modern video-sharing and content management platform VS PI Pinchflat Self-hosted YouTube media archiving for media servers
FeatureMediaCMSPinchflat
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptElixir
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 5,047★ 5,215
First released20202024
ReplacesYouTube, VimeoYouTube

Why pick each one

Choose MediaCMS if…

  • Active development
  • Good for video portals
MediaCMS details

Choose Pinchflat if…

  • Plays nicely with Plex and Jellyfin
  • Clean modern UI
Pinchflat details

Frequently asked questions

Is MediaCMS or Pinchflat better?

Pinchflat is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider MediaCMS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are MediaCMS and Pinchflat free and open-source?

Yes. MediaCMS is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pinchflat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run MediaCMS and Pinchflat with Docker?

MediaCMS: yes. Pinchflat: yes.

Related comparisons