Markor Sync vs TriliumNext Notes
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Markor Sync
Plain-text and Markdown notes editor for synced folders
VS
TriliumNext Notes
Cross-platform hierarchical note taking application with focus on
| Feature | Markor Sync | TriliumNext Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,953 | ★ 37,298 |
| First released | 2017 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Keep, Evernote | — |
Why pick each one
Choose TriliumNext Notes if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 37.3k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Markor Sync or TriliumNext Notes better?
Neither is universally better. TriliumNext Notes has the larger community, while Markor Sync is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Markor Sync and TriliumNext Notes free and open-source?
Yes. Markor Sync is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TriliumNext Notes under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Markor Sync and TriliumNext Notes with Docker?
Markor Sync: check the project docs for container support. TriliumNext Notes: yes.