Matterbridge vs matterircd
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted team chat options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Matterbridge
Bridge messages between many chat platforms
VS
matterircd
Connect to Mattermost or Slack using any IRC client
| Feature | Matterbridge | matterircd |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Team Chat | Team Chat |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,547 | ★ 310 |
| First released | 2016 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Slack | Slack desktop client |
Why pick each one
Choose matterircd if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Matterbridge or matterircd better?
Neither is universally better. Matterbridge has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Matterbridge and matterircd free and open-source?
Yes. Matterbridge is licensed under Apache-2.0 and matterircd under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Matterbridge and matterircd with Docker?
Matterbridge: yes. matterircd: yes.