Conduit vs Matterbridge
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Conduit
Simple, fast and reliable Matrix homeserver in Rust
VS
Matterbridge
Bridge messages between many chat platforms
| Feature | Conduit | Matterbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Team Chat |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,200 | ★ 7,547 |
| First released | 2020 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Slack, Discord | Slack |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Conduit or Matterbridge better?
Neither is universally better. Matterbridge has the larger community, while Conduit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Conduit and Matterbridge free and open-source?
Yes. Conduit is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Matterbridge under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Conduit and Matterbridge with Docker?
Conduit: yes. Matterbridge: yes.