Matomo vs Tianji
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Matomo
Powerful, privacy-respecting web analytics platform
VS
Tianji
Insight hub combining analytics, uptime, and server status
| Feature | Matomo | Tianji |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,749 | ★ 3,078 |
| First released | 2007 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Matomo or Tianji better?
Neither is universally better. Matomo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Matomo and Tianji free and open-source?
Yes. Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tianji under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Matomo and Tianji with Docker?
Matomo: yes. Tianji: yes.