Matomo vs Shynet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Matomo
Powerful, privacy-respecting web analytics platform
VS
Shynet
Modern, privacy-friendly, detailed web analytics
| Feature | Matomo | Shynet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 21,749 | ★ 3,145 |
| First released | 2007 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Matomo or Shynet better?
Neither is universally better. Matomo has the larger community, while Shynet is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Matomo and Shynet free and open-source?
Yes. Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Shynet under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Matomo and Shynet with Docker?
Matomo: yes. Shynet: yes.