Matomo vs Pirsch

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMatomoPirsch
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupUnder-an-hour setup
Health score96 · Excellent82 · Excellent
CategoryWeb AnalyticsWeb Analytics
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 21,893★ 1,030
First released20072020
ReplacesGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Analytics

What are Matomo and Pirsch?

Matomo

Matomo is a powerful, open-source web analytics platform that gives full ownership of data as a privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics. It targets organizations that need detailed analytics with data control. It is deployed via Docker or a PHP stack.

  • Full-featured analytics suite
  • 100% data ownership
  • Heatmaps and funnels via plugins
  • GDPR-friendly configuration

Read the full Matomo guide →

Pirsch

Pirsch is a Go library for server-side, cookie-free web analytics. The open-source repository provides the tracking and statistics code you embed in your own application; the hosted pirsch.io dashboard is a separate commercial product.

  • Cookie-free tracking
  • No personal data collected
  • Lightweight tracking script
  • Go analytics engine

Read the full Pirsch guide →

Matomo vs Pirsch: key differences

Matomo is written in PHP, while Pirsch is built with Go. Licensing differs — GPL-3.0 for Matomo versus AGPL-3.0 for Pirsch. Pirsch is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 1,024 MB for Matomo. Matomo is the more established project (first released 2007), while Pirsch arrived in 2020. Matomo has the considerably larger community, at 21,893 GitHub stars versus 1,030.

Why pick each one

Choose Matomo if…

  • Comprehensive analytics
  • Privacy-respecting
  • Mature and extensible

Watch out for

  • Heavier to self-host
  • Some features in paid plugins
Matomo details

Choose Pirsch if…

  • GDPR-friendly by design
  • Fast and efficient

Watch out for

  • Self-hosting needs assembly
  • Smaller ecosystem
Pirsch details

Frequently asked questions

Is Matomo or Pirsch better?

Neither is universally better. Matomo has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Matomo and Pirsch free and open-source?

Yes. Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Pirsch under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Matomo and Pirsch with Docker?

Matomo: yes. Pirsch: yes.

Which is lighter on resources, Matomo or Pirsch?

Pirsch has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 1,024 MB for Matomo. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons