Mastodon vs Pleroma
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mastodon
Decentralized open-source microblogging server
VS
Pleroma
Lightweight fediverse microblogging server
| Feature | Mastodon | Pleroma |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | Elixir |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 50,177 | ★ 2,200 |
| First released | 2016 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Twitter, X | Twitter, Tumblr |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Mastodon or Pleroma better?
Neither is universally better. Mastodon has the larger community, while Pleroma is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Mastodon and Pleroma free and open-source?
Yes. Mastodon is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Pleroma under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mastodon and Pleroma with Docker?
Mastodon: yes. Pleroma: yes.