Mastodon vs Nitter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMastodonNitter
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0-only
LanguageRubyNim
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 50,177★ 13,408
First released20162023
ReplacesTwitter, XX

Why pick each one

Choose Mastodon if…

  • Large fediverse network
  • Strong moderation features
Mastodon details

Choose Nitter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Nim
Nitter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mastodon or Nitter better?

Neither is universally better. Mastodon has the larger community, while Nitter is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Mastodon and Nitter free and open-source?

Yes. Mastodon is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Nitter under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mastodon and Nitter with Docker?

Mastodon: yes. Nitter: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons