Mastodon Bird UI vs Nitter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMastodon Bird UINitter
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0-only
LanguageSCSSNim
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB50 MB
Deploymentsourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 512★ 13,408
First released20222023
ReplacesTwitter web interfaceX

Why pick each one

Choose Mastodon Bird UI if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in SCSS
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 32 MB RAM
Mastodon Bird UI details

Choose Nitter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Nim
Nitter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mastodon Bird UI or Nitter better?

Neither is universally better. Nitter has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Mastodon Bird UI and Nitter free and open-source?

Yes. Mastodon Bird UI is licensed under MIT and Nitter under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mastodon Bird UI and Nitter with Docker?

Mastodon Bird UI: check the project docs for container support. Nitter: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons