Invidious vs Nitter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInvidiousNitter
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseGPL-3.0-onlyAGPL-3.0-only
LanguageCrystalNim
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM50 MB50 MB
Deploymentbare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 22,442★ 13,408
First released20232023
ReplacesYouTubeX

Why pick each one

Choose Invidious if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
  • Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Crystal
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Invidious details

Choose Nitter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 13.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Nim
Nitter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Invidious or Nitter better?

Neither is universally better. Invidious has the larger community, while Nitter is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Invidious and Nitter free and open-source?

Yes. Invidious is licensed under GPL-3.0-only and Nitter under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Invidious and Nitter with Docker?

Invidious: check the project docs for container support. Nitter: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons