massCode vs not-th.re
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
massCode
Free and open-source code snippets manager
VS
not-th.re
Simple paste sharing platform, with client side encryption, featuring
| Feature | massCode | not-th.re |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 6,945 | ★ 16 |
| First released | 2019 | 2025 |
| Replaces | GitHub Gist, SnippetsLab | — |
Why pick each one
Choose massCode if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 6.9k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose not-th.re if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Shell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is massCode or not-th.re better?
massCode is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider not-th.re if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are massCode and not-th.re free and open-source?
Yes. massCode is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and not-th.re under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run massCode and not-th.re with Docker?
massCode: check the project docs for container support. not-th.re: yes.