0bin vs not-th.re
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
0bin
Client-side encrypted pastebin requiring no user accounts
VS
not-th.re
Simple paste sharing platform, with client side encryption, featuring
| Feature | 0bin | not-th.re |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Pastebins & Snippets | Pastebins & Snippets |
| License | WTFPL | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,405 | ★ 16 |
| First released | 2012 | 2025 |
| Replaces | Pastebin.com | — |
Why pick each one
Choose 0bin if…
- Released under the WTFPL license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
Choose not-th.re if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Shell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is 0bin or not-th.re better?
0bin is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider not-th.re if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are 0bin and not-th.re free and open-source?
Yes. 0bin is licensed under WTFPL and not-th.re under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 0bin and not-th.re with Docker?
0bin: yes. not-th.re: yes.