Mark Text vs org-roam
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mark Text
Real-time preview Markdown editor for the desktop
VS
org-roam
Plain-text personal knowledge management for Emacs
| Feature | Mark Text | org-roam |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Emacs Lisp |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 59,781 | ★ 6,007 |
| First released | 2017 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Typora | Roam Research, Obsidian |
Why pick each one
Choose Mark Text if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 59.8k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose org-roam if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
- Written in Emacs Lisp
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Mark Text or org-roam better?
Mark Text is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider org-roam if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Mark Text and org-roam free and open-source?
Yes. Mark Text is licensed under MIT and org-roam under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mark Text and org-roam with Docker?
Mark Text: check the project docs for container support. org-roam: check the project docs for container support.