Mark Text vs Notabase
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mark Text
Real-time preview Markdown editor for the desktop
VS
Notabase
Personal knowledge base for networked thinking
| Feature | Mark Text | Notabase |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source | source, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 59,781 | ★ 910 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Typora | Roam Research, Obsidian |
Why pick each one
Choose Mark Text if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 59.8k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Notabase if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in TypeScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Mark Text or Notabase better?
Mark Text is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Notabase if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Mark Text and Notabase free and open-source?
Yes. Mark Text is licensed under MIT and Notabase under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mark Text and Notabase with Docker?
Mark Text: check the project docs for container support. Notabase: check the project docs for container support.