Manticore Search vs Quickwit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Manticore Search
Fast, low-footprint database for search
VS
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
| Feature | Manticore Search | Quickwit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,928 | ★ 11,471 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Splunk, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Manticore Search or Quickwit better?
Neither is universally better. Manticore Search has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Manticore Search and Quickwit free and open-source?
Yes. Manticore Search is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Manticore Search and Quickwit with Docker?
Manticore Search: yes. Quickwit: yes.