Manticore Search vs OpenSearch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Manticore Search
Fast, low-footprint database for search
VS
OpenSearch
Search and observability suite with logs and dashboards
| Feature | Manticore Search | OpenSearch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Monitoring & Status |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,928 | ★ 13,480 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Elasticsearch, Splunk |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Manticore Search or OpenSearch better?
Neither is universally better. OpenSearch has the larger community, while Manticore Search is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Manticore Search and OpenSearch free and open-source?
Yes. Manticore Search is licensed under GPL-3.0 and OpenSearch under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Manticore Search and OpenSearch with Docker?
Manticore Search: yes. OpenSearch: yes.
Related comparisons
- Manticore Search vs Apache Solr
- Manticore Search vs Elasticsearch
- OpenSearch vs Elasticsearch
- Manticore Search vs Hound
- Manticore Search vs Infinity
- OpenSearch vs Infinity
- Manticore Search vs lnx
- Manticore Search vs Lunr.js
- OpenSearch vs Lunr.js
- Manticore Search vs Sonic Note Meili-alt Bleve
- OpenSearch vs Sonic Note Meili-alt Bleve