piler vs Mailpit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
piler
Email archiving system with full-text search
VS
Mailpit
Email and SMTP testing tool with web UI
| Feature | piler | Mailpit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 10,067 |
| First released | 2012 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Mimecast, Barracuda Archiver | Mailtrap, MailHog |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is piler or Mailpit better?
Mailpit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider piler if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are piler and Mailpit free and open-source?
Yes. piler is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mailpit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run piler and Mailpit with Docker?
piler: check the project docs for container support. Mailpit: yes.