piler vs Mailspring
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
piler
Email archiving system with full-text search
VS
Mailspring
Cross-platform desktop email client
| Feature | piler | Mailspring |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 17,730 |
| First released | 2012 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Mimecast, Barracuda Archiver | Outlook, Apple Mail |
Why pick each one
Choose Mailspring if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 17.7k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is piler or Mailspring better?
Mailspring is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider piler if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are piler and Mailspring free and open-source?
Yes. piler is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mailspring under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run piler and Mailspring with Docker?
piler: check the project docs for container support. Mailspring: check the project docs for container support.