Lyrion Music Server vs Music Assistant
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lyrion Music Server
Open-source music server for Squeezebox and software players
VS
Music Assistant
Music library manager that streams to many speaker types
| Feature | Lyrion Music Server | Music Assistant |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Perl | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,750 | ★ 2,924 |
| First released | 2002 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Sonos, Spotify | Sonos, Spotify Connect |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Lyrion Music Server or Music Assistant better?
Neither is universally better. Music Assistant has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lyrion Music Server and Music Assistant free and open-source?
Yes. Lyrion Music Server is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Music Assistant under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lyrion Music Server and Music Assistant with Docker?
Lyrion Music Server: yes. Music Assistant: yes.
Related comparisons
- Lyrion Music Server vs Airsonic
- Lyrion Music Server vs Airsonic-Advanced
- Lyrion Music Server vs Ampache
- Lyrion Music Server vs Amperfy
- Lyrion Music Server vs Beets
- Music Assistant vs Beets
- Lyrion Music Server vs Feishin
- Lyrion Music Server vs Finamp
- Lyrion Music Server vs Funkwhale
- Lyrion Music Server vs Gonic