Lume vs Poole
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Lume | Poole |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Read-the-docs project | Read-the-docs project |
| Health score | 86 · Excellent | 0 · At risk |
| Status | Actively maintained | Archived |
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | source, binary | source, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,284 | ★ 31 |
| First released | 2021 | 2009 |
| Replaces | Jekyll, Hugo | Jekyll |
What are Lume and Poole?
Lume
Lume is a fast and flexible static site generator for the Deno runtime that supports many template engines and file formats out of the box. It is used to build blogs, documentation, and websites with minimal configuration.
- Built on Deno
- Many template engines
- Plugin system
- Fast static builds
Poole
Poole is a markup-agnostic, single-file static website generator written in Python that keeps the build process deliberately tiny. It is suited for small personal sites and blogs where minimalism is preferred.
- Single-file generator
- Markup-agnostic
- Embedded Python in pages
- Tiny footprint
Lume vs Poole: key differences
The biggest difference is maintenance: Poole's repository is archived and no longer developed, while Lume is actively maintained. Lume is written in TypeScript, while Poole is built with Python. Poole is the lighter option, starting around 64 MB of RAM against 128 MB for Lume. Poole is the more established project (first released 2009), while Lume arrived in 2021. Lume has the considerably larger community, at 2,284 GitHub stars versus 31.
Why pick each one
Choose Lume if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Poole if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Lume or Poole better?
Lume is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Poole if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Lume and Poole free and open-source?
Yes. Lume is licensed under MIT and Poole under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lume and Poole with Docker?
Lume: check the project docs for container support. Poole: check the project docs for container support.
Which is lighter on resources, Lume or Poole?
Poole has the smaller minimum footprint at 64 MB of RAM, compared to about 128 MB for Lume. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.