Mushroom vs ESPEasy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mushroom
Modern minimalist card collection for Home Assistant dashboards
VS
ESPEasy
Multifunctional firmware for ESP8266 and ESP32 sensors
| Feature | Mushroom | ESPEasy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | source | bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,098 | ★ 3,536 |
| First released | 2022 | 2015 |
| Replaces | proprietary smart home apps | Tuya |
Why pick each one
Choose Mushroom if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 5.1k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose ESPEasy if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (3.5k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Mushroom or ESPEasy better?
Mushroom is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider ESPEasy if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Mushroom and ESPEasy free and open-source?
Yes. Mushroom is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ESPEasy under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mushroom and ESPEasy with Docker?
Mushroom: check the project docs for container support. ESPEasy: check the project docs for container support.