Grafana Loki vs Vector

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiVector
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageGoRust
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 22,315
First released20182019
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsLogstash, Fluentd

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Vector if…

  • Extremely fast
  • Single static binary
Vector details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Vector better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Vector free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Vector under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Vector with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Vector: yes.

Related comparisons