Grafana Loki vs Sensu Go

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiSensu Go
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 1,108
First released20182018
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsDatadog, PagerDuty

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Sensu Go if…

  • Declarative configuration
  • Flexible event pipeline
Sensu Go details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Sensu Go better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Sensu Go free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sensu Go under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Sensu Go with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Sensu Go: yes.

Related comparisons