Grafana Loki vs Robusta

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiRobusta
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmkubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 3,072
First released20182021
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsDatadog, PagerDuty

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Robusta if…

  • Makes alerts actionable
  • Strong Kubernetes focus
Robusta details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Robusta better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Robusta free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Robusta under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Robusta with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Robusta: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons