Grafana Loki vs Oncall

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiOncall
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 1,256
First released20182017
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsPagerDuty

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Oncall if…

  • Simple scheduling model
  • Battle-tested at LinkedIn
Oncall details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Oncall better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Grafana Loki and Oncall free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Oncall under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Oncall with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Oncall: yes.

Related comparisons