Grafana Loki vs NetXMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiNetXMS
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageGoC++
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 391
First released20182004
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsSolarWinds, PRTG

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose NetXMS if…

  • Powerful event processing
  • Scales to large networks
NetXMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or NetXMS better?

Grafana Loki is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider NetXMS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grafana Loki and NetXMS free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and NetXMS under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and NetXMS with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. NetXMS: yes.

Related comparisons