Grafana Loki vs Naemon

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiNaemon
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0GPL-2.0
LanguageGoC
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 170
First released20182014
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsSolarWinds, PRTG

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Naemon if…

  • Faster than classic Nagios
  • Reuses Nagios plugins
Naemon details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Naemon better?

Grafana Loki is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Naemon if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grafana Loki and Naemon free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Naemon under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Naemon with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Naemon: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons