Grafana Loki vs Monitoror

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana LokiMonitoror
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 28,687★ 4,382
First released20182019
ReplacesSplunk, Datadog LogsDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana Loki if…

  • Cheap to run compared to full-text indexers
  • Familiar Prometheus-style labels
Grafana Loki details

Choose Monitoror if…

  • Great for office TVs
  • Very lightweight
Monitoror details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or Monitoror better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana Loki has the larger community, while Monitoror is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Grafana Loki and Monitoror free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Monitoror under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana Loki and Monitoror with Docker?

Grafana Loki: yes. Monitoror: yes.

Related comparisons